While being preoccupied with the NCAA tournament all weekend long, one thing has been nagging at me the whole weekend from a Pirates perspective. On Friday
the Post Gazette published a story about the Twins hot prospect Miguel Sano. You know the name. Long and short he was the prized Dominican prospect that badly wanted to play for the Pirates. Dejan also commented even more about the story on his
blog, he also mentions the loss of signing Tanner Scheppers as well. (I will defend the club for not signing an injured pitcher no matter how good he could be.)
Reading the article, as well as hearing sports talk radio bash the Pirates for not signing Sano, really got me thinking and a little peeved. For one the Pirates are being bashed for not going out and getting a player they really wanted. Well take a look around baseball and many teams really want a few players. Every team probably really, really wants to have Albert Pujols, but they can't have him. For someone to say that if the team really wants a guy they need to get him, is little short sided.
So Sano really wanted to play for the Pirates you say? Well that has me thinking as well. Here we have a 16 year old kid, a 16 year old kid, that everyone seems to say has great potential and the Pirates seem to have the inside track? I read over the
first article about Sano and there was no mention of other teams being involved. The portrait it painted was a slam dunk for the Pirates.
I have to wonder, as the story unfolded over the summer, if other teams were scared of Sano's real age. Look at
Edward Salcedo, another talented youngster that signed rather recently with the Braves, due to his age questions. Perhaps the Pirates were the only team that was not initially scarred off. Due to them being the initial team, the kid latched on being swayed by the temptations of money from the first people calling.
I think there is more to the story than we have heard, though it is now being painted by some as the team being cheap for not signing him. I tend to feel there are a lot more moving pieces that made the story end the way it did. Could the Pirates have been a little more loose with the money? Probably. But is the story as cut and dry as it has been presented? I highly doubt it.